11 Ford Taurus Owners Reveal the Real Downsides of This Car
Unveiling the Truth: Ford Taurus Owners Share Their Honest Experiences
While the Ford Taurus has established itself as a reliable and stylish sedan in its price range (official guide price: 234,800-299,800 RMB), real-world ownership reveals some consistent pain points. We’ve compiled candid feedback from 11 actual owners to give you a transparent look at the car’s potential drawbacks.
Ride Comfort and Noise Isolation Issues
Multiple owners reported concerns with ride quality and noise. A common complaint centers on the suspension being too firm, transmitting too much “road feel” into the cabin. Small vibrations and road noise from the chassis are noticeably present, detracting from the expected luxury sedan experience. One owner specifically mentioned that the sound of small (gravel) hitting the undercarriage is surprisingly loud and clear inside the cabin, which is puzzling given the car’s otherwise good noise insulation.
Interior and Tech Annoyances
The interior, while spacious, drew criticism for several ergonomic and quality details. Several owners pointed out that the seats are firmer than expected and lack optimal lumbar support, leading to discomfort and fatigue on longer drives, especially for those with existing back issues.
On the technology front, the built-in navigation system was frequently described as a letdown, with slow system responses and unreliable address input via voice command. The Bluetooth phone connection was also cited for producing audible noise during calls. Some owners expressed disappointment at the lack of certain features expected in this class, such as a power-adjustable steering wheel and daytime running lights.
Mechanical and Performance Quirks
A few owners encountered more serious mechanical concerns. There were isolated reports of the transmission behaving unexpectedly, including incidents of severe front-wheel shudder during acceleration from a stop. One owner also reported a recurring airbag warning light illuminating on the dashboard.
Other quirks included the automatic rain-sensing wipers being unresponsive in light rain and the positioning of the driver’s side window controls being slightly too far forward for easy reach.
Fuel Economy and Design Choices
Given the vehicle’s substantial weight, fuel consumption in city driving was a common drawback, with some owners reporting averages as high as 13.5 L/100km. While highway efficiency is better, the urban fuel economy is a significant consideration.
From a design perspective, the choice of black exterior paint was noted for showing dirt and dust very easily. A few also mentioned the unfortunate visibility of exposed wiring under the steering column and the fact that the rear seats do not fold down, limiting cargo flexibility.
The Bottom Line for Taurus Owners
It’s important to note that many of these owners still expressed overall satisfaction with their Taurus, appreciating its power, space, and styling. However, these shared experiences highlight areas where Ford’s execution may fall short of customer expectations for a car in this segment. For potential buyers, being aware of these common issues—particularly regarding ride comfort, tech functionality, and real-world fuel economy—is crucial for making an informed decision. A thorough test drive, paying close attention to these specific points, is highly recommended.
